viewerlkp.blogg.se

Connect your Philips GoGear MP3 player to the computer with the supplied USB cable.Questions: 😎 How to download music for philips mp3 player? Those who are looking for an answer to the question «How to download music to philips mp4 player?» often ask the following Right-click the songs to copy to the player, select "Add to Device" and then click "Philips GoGear" to download music to your player. Top best answers to the question «How to download music to philips mp4 player» Answered by Trycia Thiel on Sun, 1:40 AMĬlick the "Music" link under "Library" to view the songs copied to the library. Video answer: Philips gogear vibe 4gb mp3 player review

Question «How to download music to philips mp4 player»Īnswer to the question «How to download music to philips mp4 player?» often ask the following Just stick with and for information on video (silly ExtremeTech doesn’t even test XviD even though it is DivX’s toughest competitor in terms of quality MPEG-4 encoding) and audio compression, respectively, because that site is utter crap in these departmens.Video answer: How to download music onto an mp3 player Not even to mention the fact that you are chaining yourself to a closed platform by using it. Particularly for Ogg Vorbis, because I strongly suspect that they used the option “–managed” to force the codec to make something very close to CBR (and also completely wreck its output).Īnd finally: How did they manage to end up with rating WMA 9 at 9/10? AFAICT, that codec is just crap compared to MPC (which they didn’t even include in the test - even though it would have won the VBR test easily, I think) and a properly used LAME –alt-preset standard. Also, I’d like to know more than the mean such as variance and/or 95% confidence intervals for the mean.ģ) What the h*ll went wrong with their test of LAME? Either they must have mistakenly downloaded a Xing encoder, which is known for its slaugther of audio quality with its 16kHz frequency cut off, or maybe they just don’t know about the –alt-presets? Besides, they should have used 3.90.3 and not 3.95.1 which is not yet known to be “safe” (for lack of a better word).Ĥ) Just *how* did they encode with Ogg Vorbis and LAME? I’d like to see some command line options here. It simply sounds a little too bright.Ģ) 6 people is really too little to get a representative sample.

This is also known as the “high frequency boost”, and is a commonly acknowledged problem with Ogg Vorbis 1.0. Even worse is that they actually draw a few semi-conclusions from this such as saying that Ogg Vorbis has a smooth trail off at high frequencies. I suspect they did it only such that people wouldn’t get bored reading through the long text. There are so many things wrong with their methodology I don’t know where to start.ġ) Looking at graphs is a complete waste of time.